Viewpoint

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00335

Recyclable and contaminated waste from cardiac procedures: a call to action for a sustainable catheterisation laboratory and operating theatre

Haitham Amin1, MD, FSCAI, FACC, FRCPC; Nooraldaem Yousif1, MD, FRCP, FESC, FACC; Thomas F. Lüscher2,3,4, MD, FRCP, FESC, FACC

Globally, healthcare produces 4% to 5% of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with a predicted 3-fold increase by 20501. The exponential growth of medical waste contributes to global carbon emissions and poses a significant challenge to environmental sustainability2. Hospitals contribute disproportionately to a substantial carbon footprint, especially in energy intensive areas such as radiology suites, operating rooms, and cardiac catheterisation laboratories (CCLs). The number of cardiac procedures worldwide is increasing, with expanding medical facilities to cater for a growing population. Scarce attention has been given to quantifying and reducing waste from CCLs and cardiac operating theatres (COTs) to help lower the carbon footprint3.

Our CCLs and COTs have a routine waste management protocol in place: all contaminated waste gets collected in designated “yellow” bags, gets shredded, autoclaved, and then placed in disposal bags that go to landfills. Incineration of contaminated waste is another disposal route. Non-contaminated waste including paper, plastics, and cardboard boxes (packaging from balloon catheters, stents, guides etc.) are collected in “green” bags. All this potentially recyclable waste goes to landfills due to the lack of...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 20 Number 16
Aug 19, 2024
Volume 20 Number 16
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

10.4244/EIJV10I4A71 Aug 19, 2014
Innovations: resetting our thinking to solve problems
Serruys PW
free

10.4244/EIJV9I2A28 Jun 28, 2013
Numbers needed to treat (lives!) and numbers needed to save (money)
Ribichini F et al
free

Jan 11, 2011
IVUS in bifurcation stenting: what have we learned?
Trabattoni D and Bartorelli AL
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00067 Jan 20, 2025
Myval transcatheter heart valve system: a new TAVI contender and remaining uncertainties
Windecker S and Tomii D
free

Jan 11, 2011
How to solve difficult side branch access?
Burzotta F et al
free

May 25, 2010
Integrated anatomy and viability assessment PET-CT
Saraste A et al
free
Trending articles
311.63

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
154.03

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
145.6

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00454 Oct 20, 2021
Transseptal puncture: procedural guidance, challenging situations and management of complications
Russo G et al
free
110.9

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00130 Oct 9, 2020
Double-kissing culotte technique for coronary bifurcation stenting
Toth GG et al
free
77.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
34.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00606 Jan 1, 2024
Targeting inflammation in atherosclerosis: overview, strategy and directions
Waksman R et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved